Social Articles
#1 in Business Subscribe Email Print

You are here: Home > News and Society > Pure Opinion > Drug Testing for Welfare Recipients

Tags

  • regulatory
  • illegal
  • clinton
  • makes sense
  • companies involved

  • Links

  • The Bible - More Than Just Words
  • First Steps To Planning A Wedding
  • Avoid One of the Worst Pieces of Advice for New Breastfeeding Moms
  • Social Articles - Drug Testing for Welfare Recipients

    It's funny how selective the mainstream news media are in their war coverage. While American television viewers receive wall-to-wall coverage of the war in Iraq, we
    According to USFDA, a combination product is one composed of any combination of a drug and device; biological product and device; drug and biological product
    seldom hear about our nation's decades-long war on illegal drugs.

    Of course, the country's drug war petered out during the "I didn't inhale" Clinton years. With ano
    ; or drug, device, and biological product and fixed dose combination would include two or more combinations of drug.

    Examples of combination products may in
    ther Clinton vying for the White House, it only makes sense to revisit the drug issue. Is our nation really doing enough to free its citizens from the slavery of add
    lude drug-coated devices, drugs packaged with delivery devices in medical kits, and drugs and devices packaged separately but intended to be used together.

    iction, and the loss of opportunities and dreams that result from illegal drug use?

    Unfortunately, America has become far too tolerant of illegal drug use. This is
    here is enormous increase in the number of combination products entering the market in the recent years. Combination products have proven advantages but fixe
    disturbing, considering the fact that the illegal drug trade can seriously jeopardize our national security.

    Fortunately, there are a few simple common-sense actions
    d dose combinations are still in the process of convincing regulatory authority on their advantages over the single ingredient formulations.

    Combination pro
    we could take to stem our country's reliance on illegal drugs. For instance, it only makes sense that welfare recipients should have to take drug tests in order to
    ucts have become life saving products for the pharmaceutical companies who doesn’t have many innovative molecules in their product pipeline and have been inc
    qualify for benefits.

    Before you assume that this is an unfair burden, consider the fact that many workers must submit to drug tests before they're even called in fo
    easingly used in the product life cycle management. Even the companies having product patents are trying to extend their product life cycle through the combi
    r a job interview. Companies and even federal agencies realize that illegal drug use can lead to a host of problems on the job—lost productivity, absenteeism, undepe
    nation products and maximize the revenues. But the companies involved in this practice are overlooking that they are burdening the patients both economically
    ndability, and even violence. For the proper functioning of businesses and government offices, a drug-free workplace simply must be maintained.

    If drug tests are re
    and physically. They need to rightly judge the benefits of the combination products and they have to even look at the risks involved when combining the produ
    quired for those who work, it only makes sense that they should also be mandated for individuals who are being supported by our tax dollars. After all, what incentiv
    ts. Some of the combination products were well accepted by physicians while others suffered. Companies involved in development of combination products are fi
    e does a welfare recipient have to kick cocaine, as long as he has money in his pocket provided by Uncle Sam?

    Such a policy would not be punitive. Rather, it would
    ding difficulty in defining their combination products and facing various challenges from selecting a combination to marketing it.

    Following aspects would a
    actually be quite benevolent. For, if you truly care about the poor, you'll be concerned enough to help relieve them of dependence on illegal chemicals to cope with
    dd to the challenges in developing combination products:

    Which markets to tap where the combination products can do fairly well?
    Which combination prod
    the stresses and strains of life.

    Of course, you might wonder why a fiscal conservative would propose a new government program like drug testing for welfare clients.
    cts are meaningful and rational?
    Which therapeutic categories to select?
    Which Combinations can address unmet needs of the patients?
    Do combin
    The fact is that such a program could easily pay for itself. I propose that the cost of drug testing be covered by those who have been kicked out of the program, g
    tions increase the patient compliance?
    What would be the developing cost?
    How to tackle the risks encountered during combination product developmen
    iving them new incentive to get jobs.

    Opponents of drug testing of welfare clients claim that U.S. drug laws unfairly target the poor. The fact of the matter is tha
    t?

    As combination products don't fit into the traditional categories of drugs, medical devices, or biological products, the USFDA is in the process of devel
    t our drug laws are simply designed to protect all citizens, rich and poor, from the ravages of the illegal drug trade.

    Ronald Reagan had it right in the 1980s when
    ping new procedures for reviewing their safety, efficacy and quality.

    Professional from academic institutions, pharmaceutical industries, health care indust
    he launched a federal war on drugs and enacted a zero-tolerance drug policy within his administration. The Gipper ordered drug testing of federal workers, demonstrat
    y and representatives from various regulatory agencies are working out to design the regulatory requirements for manufacture and sale of combination products
    ing his concern and compassion for American families. Congress also had it right in 1996 when it enacted the Welfare Reform Act—an act which authorized states to con
    .

    As there is an increasing trend of the combination products companies manufacturing such products should be able to tackle the problems involved in the de
    duct mandatory drug testing as a precursor to state welfare benefits.

    Our illegal drug problem is a national disgrace. It will not die quietly. It's up to public o
    elopment. They need to be wiser in analyzing the market trends and the regulatory requirements.

    Companies that provide selfless information through particip
    fficials to take bold action against the drug lords who threaten the safety and sanity of our children. And that begins by forcing drug abusers off the welfare rolls


    tion in industry events and feedback to regulatory authorities would be able to face the challenges and will be successful in developing combination products

    HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
    <a href="http://www.socialarticles.org.ua/article/194882/socialarticles-Drug-Testing-for-Welfare-Recipients.html">Drug Testing for Welfare Recipients</a>

    BB link (for phorums):
    [url=http://www.socialarticles.org.ua/article/194882/socialarticles-Drug-Testing-for-Welfare-Recipients.html]Drug Testing for Welfare Recipients[/url]

    Related Articles:

    Day Trading Forex Market Behaviour

    Term Life Insurance - What the Heck Does 'Annuitant' Mean?

    MLM Leads - The Top 15 MLM Lead Companies in Network Marketing

    Bookmark it: del.icio.us digg.com reddit.com netvouz.com google.com yahoo.com technorati.com furl.net bloglines.com socialdust.com ma.gnolia.com newsvine.com slashdot.org simpy.com shadows.com blinklist.com