Social Articles - News and Society

Skepticism and Atheism: a case of judging the book by its cover Skepticism and atheism are the principal players in stating that God does not exist for the following reasons:

1. For the skeptics: they need evidence or proof before they could say a thing exists or not.

According to USFDA, a combination product is one composed of any combination of a drug and device; biological product and device; drug and biological product

That means that for a thing to be said to exist, they need direct evidence or proof; and, for a thing said not to exist, they also need direct proof or evidence. For example, if I say that "I have a pen in my pocket," then you should be able to see it (or not see it). Sin

; or drug, device, and biological product and fixed dose combination would include two or more combinations of drug.

Examples of combination products may in

ce there's no way to prove or disprove God's existence (since none of us has seen or not seen God to prove or disprove his existence), then it's best to keep silent and suspend our judgment.

2. For the atheists: they deny God's existence on the basis of the problem of ev

lude drug-coated devices, drugs packaged with delivery devices in medical kits, and drugs and devices packaged separately but intended to be used together.

il. This is the stronger argument for God's non-existence because if God is said to be all powerful and all good, then why didn't he prevent the most wicked kind of evil from happening. Now, many pro-God would say that evil is necessary in order for us to learn something

here is enormous increase in the number of combination products entering the market in the recent years. Combination products have proven advantages but fixe

from it, and be good the next time; and that God is testing us. That God is testing us is the weakest argument for God's existence and wisdom because that would mean that God is insensitive to man's sufferings (never mind if Hitler suffered, maybe, he deserved it. But wha

d dose combinations are still in the process of convincing regulatory authority on their advantages over the single ingredient formulations.

Combination pro

t about the children who were gassed and burned? What did they do?) As a mother, you might want to let your child go through painful but necessary experiences in order for him/ her to grow into a better person. However, if he is about to hit by a truck and there's time to

ucts have become life saving products for the pharmaceutical companies who doesn’t have many innovative molecules in their product pipeline and have been inc

save him from this, would you just standby and let it happen, and hopefully he will survive and learn from it? What would happen if he didn't survive? So, based on how God is defined and this kind of evil that does happen, then the atheists say that either God does not e

easingly used in the product life cycle management. Even the companies having product patents are trying to extend their product life cycle through the combi

xist, or he is not at all all-good. If God is truly an all good and all powerful (both traits are incompatible, do you see that?) then I will have to side with the atheists.

Skeptics can't stay undecided for long. That's when they become atheists. Meaning, they decided t

nation products and maximize the revenues. But the companies involved in this practice are overlooking that they are burdening the patients both economically

o go for evidence. And, since there's no proof or evidence for God's existence, then they decide to claim that God does not exist.

My argument against skepticism and atheism can be expressed in this way: if one has already judged something not to exist just because it do

and physically. They need to rightly judge the benefits of the combination products and they have to even look at the risks involved when combining the produ

esn't meet one's standards, then, isn't it unfair? It's like pre-judging someone to be a liar although he may be telling the truth just because he can't stand his guts. It's much the same way as the skeptics and the atheists are doing in the matter of God's existence. Bef

ts. Some of the combination products were well accepted by physicians while others suffered. Companies involved in development of combination products are fi

ore they go out to prove (or, disprove) God's existence, they have already set the rules on how they would like to judge a thing to exist or not. That is, they used the tools of science - not that I am against science. What are the tools of science? They are: observing, t

ding difficulty in defining their combination products and facing various challenges from selecting a combination to marketing it.

Following aspects would a

esting, experimentation.

Now, these may work for certain things. But, would they work, for example, on love? So, they ask what is love? And they, the chemists, speak of love in terms of chemistry. Or, they, the biologists, would speak of love in terms of biology. They,

dd to the challenges in developing combination products:

Which markets to tap where the combination products can do fairly well?
Which combination prod

for instance, would say that love does not exist, because it is only 'used' for the species to survive for another generation. Or, in terms of chemistry, love is nothing but a chemical reaction. These things may happen when two people are in love. But is that what we huma

cts are meaningful and rational?
Which therapeutic categories to select?
Which Combinations can address unmet needs of the patients?
Do combin

n beings mean by love? What I am trying to say is that if you want to judge something, then judge it on its own basis, not on something else. Otherwise, that would be prejudging.

I think the best way to know whether God exists is by understanding the terms and experience

tions increase the patient compliance?
What would be the developing cost?
How to tackle the risks encountered during combination product developmen

of those who truly believe in God existence, and not on terms of those who pretend to believe in God, when in fact, they are just using God to fulfill their own desires. So, when one prays to God for more money, then you can be sure that he doesn't believe in God for God

t?

As combination products don't fit into the traditional categories of drugs, medical devices, or biological products, the USFDA is in the process of devel

's sake. Who are those who truly believe in God so that we can say that there is a God? It's like saying: who are those who truly love their children? Not all parents do. But some parents love, and would die for their kids. They're the ones we listen to if we want to unde

ping new procedures for reviewing their safety, efficacy and quality.

Professional from academic institutions, pharmaceutical industries, health care indust

rstand the true meaning of love.

Which leads me to this: who are the true believers? They are those who don't ask God for any favor, who don't bargain with God. They are the ones who believe in God only because God is God; the ones who believe in God for God's sake. They

y and representatives from various regulatory agencies are working out to design the regulatory requirements for manufacture and sale of combination products

are the ones whom we should listen to, in order to determine whether or not God exists (or, to even give serious consideration). In fact, by listening to them, we will soon realize whether or not we are prepared to believe in God. If I am still selfish, then I cannot tru

.

As there is an increasing trend of the combination products companies manufacturing such products should be able to tackle the problems involved in the de

ly be said to know that God exists; nor can I truly be said to understand the meaning of believing in God.

It all boils down: not that God does not exist, but am I strong enough, spiritually and psychologically, to believe in God?

Therefore, it's best to listen to those

elopment. They need to be wiser in analyzing the market trends and the regulatory requirements.

Companies that provide selfless information through particip

who truly experienced God's presence rather than to those who believe in God for selfish reasons or, than to those who judge that God does not exist on the basis of what other people say. And usually, they are the ones who don't understand the meaning of believing in God

tion in industry events and feedback to regulatory authorities would be able to face the challenges and will be successful in developing combination products

HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
<a href="http://www.socialarticles.org.ua/article/194637/socialarticles-Skepticism-And-Atheism--A-Case-Of-Judging-The-Book-By-Its-Cover.html">Skepticism And Atheism - A Case Of Judging The Book By Its Cover</a>

BB link (for phorums):
[url=http://www.socialarticles.org.ua/article/194637/socialarticles-Skepticism-And-Atheism--A-Case-Of-Judging-The-Book-By-Its-Cover.html]Skepticism And Atheism - A Case Of Judging The Book By Its Cover[/url]

We can't emphasize enough the importance of including keyword-rich content on your site to increase your ranking potential. Simply put, keywords are the words and/or word phrases people use when sear...

Used cars can be an outstanding deal and save you a ton of money if you shop carefully. There is no sense in losing thousands of dollars in value when you drive a new car off the lot. Get the most value from a used car.

When choosing a satellite TV service people tend to ask, what gives DIRECTV System an edge? First of all, a DIRECTV System uses nationally manufactured hardware in a patriotic and business respective way.

Tags

Links

Social Articles - Skepticism And Atheism - A Case Of Judging The Book By Its Cover

Related Articles: